Legal Opinion

(HC) Selck v. County of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 7, 2022No. 2:21-cv-01499Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MORREY SELCK, No. 2:21-CV-1499-TLN-DMC-P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, who is proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court are Respondent’s motion to 19 dismiss, ECF No. 17, Petitioner’s opposition to the motion to dismiss, ECF No. 20, Respondent’s 20 reply to the opposition, ECF No. 21, and Petitioner’s amendment to opposition to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. McFarland v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Nathaniel James v. Robert G. Borg, Warden Attorney General of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. Dickey v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API