Ferdinand v. City of Fairbanks
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., and CON-NOR, BOOCHEVER, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ. CONNOR, Justice.
This case presents the narrow question of whether the court below was correct in concluding that, as a matter of law, an award of fees under the provisions of the Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 1988, must be limited to partial rather than full compensation. 1
In the winter of 1977, the Fairbanks Municipal Utilities Service (M.U.S.) cut off electrical power to Rodger Ferdinand’s residence because of non-payment of a disputed bill. Ferdinand sued on behalf of himself and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Stratos v. Department of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- State v. HaleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. Native Village of NunapitchukAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Hughes v. Foster Wheeler Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Triangle, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.