Legal Opinion

Ferdinand v. City of Fairbanks

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1979No. 3724PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., and CON-NOR, BOOCHEVER, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ. CONNOR, Justice.

This case presents the narrow question of whether the court below was correct in concluding that, as a matter of law, an award of fees under the provisions of the Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 1988, must be limited to partial rather than full compensation. 1

In the winter of 1977, the Fairbanks Municipal Utilities Service (M.U.S.) cut off electrical power to Rodger Ferdinand’s residence because of non-payment of a disputed bill. Ferdinand sued on behalf of himself and…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Stratos v. Department of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. State v. HaleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. Native Village of NunapitchukAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Hughes v. Foster Wheeler Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Triangle, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API