Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. Stenacker
New York Supreme Court
Motion ex parte to vacate injunction pendente lite.
1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.
This is a motion ex parte to vacate an injunction pendente lite. The action is brought to secure an injunction restraining the defendant from violating a contract of employment made with the plaintiff. A temporary injunction ex parte was granted upon the summons and complaint (Code Civ. Pro. § 603) and the motion to vacate the injunction must be decided, therefore, upon the sufficiency of the complaint alone. An injunction may accompany a summons and become operative upon its service. People ex rel. Cauffman v. Van Buren, 136 N. Y. 252. The purpose of an injunction pendente lite is to prevent…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McCall Co. v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- People Ex Rel. Cauffman v. . Van BurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Brass v. . RathboneNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Daly v. SmithThe Superior Court of New York City · 1874
- De Rivafinoli v. CorsettiNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. WarrenNew York Supreme Court · 1919