Tibbs v. State

Appellate counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), in this appeal, pointing out certain alleged errors in the imposition of costs, a public defender lien, and special conditions of probation. None of the alleged errors appear to have been objected to. Appellant filed a brief pro se raising points which do not require further discussion.

We AFFIRM the sentences without modification, as none of the errors asserted is fundamental. See Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). See also Smith v. State, 723 So.2d 872…