Legal Opinion
Leeker v. Gill Studios, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 10, 1998No. CIV. A. 97-2541-KHVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
On October 24, 1997, plaintiff Rhonda Leeker filed suit against her former employer, defendant Gill Studios, Inc. (“Gill Studios”) seeking damages for employment discrimination in violation of Title VII, and specifically, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(k) Plaintiff also asserted a state law claim under the Kansas Act Against Discrimination (“KAAD”), K.S.A § 44-1001 et seq. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Gill Studios, Inc. ’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 17) filed July 1, 1998. For reasons stated more fully…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Green v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2002
- Henry v. Unified School District 503District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Greater US Services Incorporated, et al. v. Mary J Gower Revocable Trust Dated November 18, 1999, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026