Legal Opinion

Dowling v. Springer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 12, 1940No. 28706PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

Plaintiff Dickson purchased a tract of land in Cleveland county, having the conveyance made to the defendant Ford. Shortly thereafter he purchased a mortgage against the same land, having it assigned to plaintiff Dowling. Dowling instituted this action to foreclose the mortgage, and Dickson was thereafter made a party plaintiff. Defendants Springer, Manley, and Foster Minerals Corporation were purchasers of mineral interests from a grantee of the mortgagor, and defendant Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company was the owner of an oil and gas mining lease covering the land. The interests of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moats v. Thompson, Exrs.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Meacham v. SteeleIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Kahn v. McConnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. O'Reilly v. McLeanUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Chickasha, Oklahoma v. NathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Paris Bank of Texas v. CusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Bank of the Wichitas v. LedfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. Wechter v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Rubendall v. TallaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API