Dowling v. Springer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
Plaintiff Dickson purchased a tract of land in Cleveland county, having the conveyance made to the defendant Ford. Shortly thereafter he purchased a mortgage against the same land, having it assigned to plaintiff Dowling. Dowling instituted this action to foreclose the mortgage, and Dickson was thereafter made a party plaintiff. Defendants Springer, Manley, and Foster Minerals Corporation were purchasers of mineral interests from a grantee of the mortgagor, and defendant Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company was the owner of an oil and gas mining lease covering the land. The interests of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moats v. Thompson, Exrs.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Meacham v. SteeleIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
- Kahn v. McConnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- O'Reilly v. McLeanUtah Supreme Court · 1934
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Chickasha, Oklahoma v. NathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Paris Bank of Texas v. CusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Bank of the Wichitas v. LedfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Wechter v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1943
- Rubendall v. TallaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.