State v. Denney
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Langenbach, J. †
The defendant was convicted of the crime of an attempt to obtain a narcotic drug by fraud, deceit, misrepresentation or subterfuge. He has appealed. Another man was likewise charged with the same ofíense. He pleaded guilty and testified for the state. The defendant did not testify. The appeal was perfected upon a short record.
There was sufficient evidence to establish the following facts to the satisfaction of the jury which found him guilty. The codefendant testified he had known appellant for years. Prior to the time in question, he had procured narcotics from a drugstore in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BaddaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. HolbrookWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. McCaskeyWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. RosencransWashington Supreme Court · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. CarothersWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. RandeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Crowe v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.