Legal Opinion

Hoe v. Cottrell

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut

Decided March 30, 1880PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShipman, J.

This is a bill in equity, based upon the alleged infringement of letters patent, which were granted on March 16, 1869, to Richard M. Hoe, as the assignee of Auguste Hippolyte Marinoni, for an improvement in lithographic printing presses. The patent has been assigned to tho plaintiffs.

The first question is whether Marinoni was the sole inventor of the alleged improvement, or was a joint inventor with Francis Noel Chandre. In 1866 Mr. Iloe was in France, and purchased from Marinoni all his right to the invention in consequence of the future grant of letters patent therefor in the United States.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. Mancius v. LawtonNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  2. Stimpson v. WoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1870

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Westinghouse v. New York Air-Brake Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1893
  2. Heller Bros. v. Crucible Steel Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
  3. Hale & Kilburn Mfg. Co. v. Oneonta, C. & R. S. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1903
  4. Hallock v. Babcock Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1903
  5. Commonwealth v. RozenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API