Legal Opinion · Dissent

Territory v. Awana

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1925No. 1610Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OP

PERRY, X

In instruction No. 9 the jury was told that “in determining the weight to be given the testimony of the witnesses you are authorized to consider their relationship to the parties, if any, their interest, if any, in the result of this case, their temper, feeling or bias,” etc.; and in No. 10 it was instructed that “in determining the degree of credibility that shall be accorded to his testimony” (defendant’s) “the jury have a right to take into consid eration the fact that he is interested in the result of the prosecution as well as his demeanor and conduct upon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hicks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. People v. MaughsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. People v. BorenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Buckley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Erickson v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API