Legal Opinion

Stuart v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1995No. 20060PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice. 1

This is an appeal by Gene Francis Stuart (Stuart) from the denial of his second petition for post conviction relief in which he alleged that his telephone calls from the Clearwater County Jail to his attorney(s) had been im-permissibly monitored or taped. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court denied Stuart’s petition, concluding that Stuart had failed to carry his burden of proof. Because we hold that there is not substantial and competent evidence to support the district court’s finding that the intentional destruction of portions of the relevant telephone logs…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Stuart v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. DeRushé v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. McCarty v. GilchristCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. HawkinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Stuart v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API