Legal Opinion

Application of James A. Dinwiddie

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 22, 1965No. Patent Appeal 7385PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 7-12 of application serial No. 714,097, filed February 10, 1958, for “Catalytic Process.”

After the examiner’s final rejection of some of the appealed claims and others on a variety of grounds, including nine prior art patents, appellant filed an amendment cancelling some claims and substituting two of the present claims and arguing all of the rejections. Upon the examiner’s refusal to enter the amendment and refusing to alter his stand, appellant appealed to the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Application of Christian Zickendraht and Arthur BuehlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. In re SarettUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. Application of John D. Sutherland, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Application of Richard E. Warner and Virginia Ann WarnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  2. Application of Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  3. Application of Myron J. Jursich and Gail T. RandichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  4. Application of Myron J. Jursich and Gail T. RandichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  5. Application of Richard E. Warner and Virginia Ann WarnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API