Parrish v. . Hartman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The order striking out defendants’ purported statement of case on appeal, because not served in time, is supported by a long line of decisions, of which S. v. Moore, 210 N. C., 686, 188 S. E., 421, may be cited as the most recent. The failure to have a “case on appeal,” however, does not ipso facto work a dismissal. Roberts v. Bus Co., 198 N. C., 779, 153 S. E., 398. Non constat that error may not appear on the face o'f the record proper. Edwards v. Perry, 208 N. C., 252, 179 S. E., 892; Wallace v. Salisbury, 147 N. C., 58, 60 S. E., 713.
Here; error does appear on the face of the record…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Wallace v. . SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Roberts v. Greensboro-Fayetteville Bus Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Edwards v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. . ParnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Yancey v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Respass v. BonnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953