Legal Opinion

Hoger v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 2, 1938No. 31,753PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Coring, Justice.

In a suit to recover for an injury caused by the breaking of a porcelain faucet handle in the bathroom of an apartment rented to plaintiff and his mother by the defendant Shanedling, the plaintiff had a verdict and the defendant Shanedling appealed from an order denying his blended motion for judgment or a new trial, the corporate defendant having obtained a directed verdict.

Plaintiff and his mother jointly rented a five-room-and-bath apartment from month to month at a rental of $22 per month from the defendant Shanedling on September 1, 1935. The contract was oral, and there…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Dahl v. Valley Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fontaine v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API