Legal Opinion

Bryant v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2006No. 48S04-0602-CR-40PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

This is one of a good many cases that were pending on direct appeal when Indiana's criminal sentencing scheme was declared unconstitutional under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and to which that holding therefore applies. Here, the trial court enhanced a sentence based on a finding that the perpetrator "lay in wait" and on the perpetrator's prior criminal convie-tions. Under Blakely, the first of these findings must be made by a jury. Uncertain about the nature of the prior convie-tions and whether they warrant a maximum…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Smylie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Wooley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Morgan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Steven M. Sandleben v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Henderson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Creekmore v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Monroe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API