Legal Opinion

Coggins v. Coggins

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided February 11, 2014No. 2012-CA-02030-COAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MAXWELL, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. This is our second opportunity to review the chancellor’s award to Alicia Al*639varado Coggins of (1) periodic alimony and (2) the designation of beneficiary to her ex-husband’s life-insurance policy. When these two awards were first before this court in 2012, we reversed and remanded these issues back to the chancery court. The chancellor followed our mandate. He determined alimony was necessary, even when Alicia’s estate was properly valued, and he explained his reason for requiring Alicia’s ex-husband, Bill Coggins, to maintain life insurance for Alicia’s benefit.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ArmstrongMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In Re Estate of HodgesMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Scharwath v. ScharwathMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Carter v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McMinn v. McMinnCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API