Maze v. Bowater, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Patrick Maze sued his employer, Bowater, Inc., to recover workers' compensation benefits. Bowater answered, saying Maze was not entitled to benefits because his injuries, Bowater said, were caused by his own willful misconduct and his willful failure or refusal to use a safety appliance that Bowater had supplied him. The parties agreed to submit the issue of Bowater's liability to the trial court for its decision based upon depositions, documentary evidence, and affidavits. After considering the evidence submitted, the trial court entered a judgment in favor of Bowater, finding that Maze's…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. NationsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Sun Papers, Inc. v. JerrellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Town of Addison v. CookeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ex Parte Bowater, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Nesmith v. H & a Indus. Painting, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Maze v. Bowater, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999