Legal Opinion
General Steel Domestic Sales, LLC v. Hogan & Hartson, LLP
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided March 18, 2010No. 09CA0252PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Chief Judge DAVIDSON.
Plaintiffs, General Steel Domestic Sales and Jeffrey W. Knight, appeal from the C.R.C.P. 12(b)(5) dismissal of their Colorado Consumer Protection Act (CCPA) claim against defendants, Hogan & Hartson, LLP and Ty Cobb, and from that part of the judgment precluding plaintiffs from recovering consequential damages in their claim of breach of contract. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
I. Background
These facts are not disputed: plaintiffs retained Ty Cobb and his firm, Hogan & Hartson, to defend General Steel against an action brought by the Colorado…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Town of Alma v. AZCO Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Been v. O.K. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Metropolitan Gas Repair Service, Inc. v. KulikSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Hall v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Rhino Linings USA, Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Rhino Lining, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Curtis Lumber Co., Inc. v. Louisiana Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- HealthONE of Denver, Inc. v. UnitedHealth Group Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2011
- Mendoza v. Pioneer General Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- State of Colorado v. Robert J. Hopp & Associates, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- Curtis Lumber Co., Inc. v. Louisiana Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.