Legal Opinion

THOMAS P. VALENTI, PC v. Swanson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 22, 1998No. 3-97-0371PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin

In this case we are asked to rule that an attorney may not recover legal fees under a theory of quantum meruit if he fails to comply with the Personal Injury Representation Agreement Act (Act) (815 ILCS 640/0.01 et seq. (West 1996)). We disagree that such a holding is required by Illinois law and thus affirm the trial court’s judgement.

FACTS

The facts are relatively undisputed. On October 7, 1994, Lorraine and Arthur Swanson were involved in an automobile accident. Four days later, they hired attorney Valenti to represent them on a contingent fee basis. Valenti did not provide the Swansons…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Belfield v. CoopIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Rhoades v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Miller v. SolomonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  4. Warner v. BastenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  5. Town of Mt. Vernon v. PattonIllinois Supreme Court · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. K. Miller Const. Co., Inc. v. McGinnisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  2. Much Shelist Freed Denenberg & Ament, P.C. v. LisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  3. MUCH SHELIST FREED DENENBERG AND AMENT, PC v. LisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. Midstate Siding and Window Co. v. RogersAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  5. Vandenberg v. RQM, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API