Legal Opinion

Pate v. Wright

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1868PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from the Switzerland Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

Suit by the appellant against the appellees on *477a contract for the sale and delivery of three thousand barrels of flour. The complaint is in four paragraphs.

The first paragraph alleges the sale of three thousand barrels of “ Double Extra Montezuma Mills Family Flour” to the plaintiff, by sample, for $28,800, paid down; that the sample was of a “superior double-extra grade of flour,” known in the market at New Orleans as “Montezuma' Double Extra Flour;” that the defendants undertook and warranted the bulk of said three thousand barrels of flour to correspond with the sample; that the three…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Perkins v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. PotterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  2. Natural Gas Products Co. v. ThurmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  3. City of Indianapolis v. WannIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. TINDER, PROS. ATTY. v. Clarke Auto Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. McAfee v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API