Legal Opinion

Wierk v. The Mary Adelaide Randall

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 8, 1893No. 907PublishedCited by 12 opinions

In Admiralty. Cross suits for damages by collision..

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, District Judge.

These are cross libels for damages caused by a collision. There is no disputed question of law. There is the usual conflict of testimony as to the material questions of fact It is agreed that the collision occurred in the lower bay of New York, in the main channel, between Swinbum island and the bell buoy at the head of the swash channel; that the four-masted schooner Bandall struck the fishing steamer Havana; that the time of the collision was December 21, 1891, about half past B In the afternoon; that the day was clear; that the wind was blowing about 40 miles an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The FannieSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. The Sea GullSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Mitchell Transp. Co. v. ChisholmCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1892

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fulton v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  2. Sun Oil Co. v. The GulfstarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  3. Brigham v. LuckenbachDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1905
  4. The Greystoke CastleDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1912
  5. The PocomokeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API