Wooster v. Handy
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
Blatchford, Justice.
This suit is brought on two reissued patents. One is reissue No. 6,565, granted to George H. Wooster, July 27, 1875, (on an application for a reissue filed June 22, 1875,) for an “improvement in machines for making ruffles, ” the original patent, .No. 37,550, having been granted to Pipo and Sherwood, Janu■ary 27, 1863, on the invention of John A. Pipo. The other is reissue No. 6,566, granted to George H. Wooster, July 27, 1875, (on an application for a reissue filed July 19, 1875,) for an “improvement in sewing-machines for making band-ruffling,” the original patent, No.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Gill v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Gage v. HerringSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Powder Co. v. Powder WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- John Perkins v. Edward F. Fourniquet and Wife, and Martin W. Ewing and WifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mendenhall v. Barber-Greene Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Sontag Chain Stores Co. v. National Nut Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States Envelope Co. v. Transo Paper Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1916
- Hoe v. KahlerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
- Robert L. Mendenhall and Cmi Corporation v. Barber-Greene Company, Defendant/cross-Appellant. Robert C. Mendenhall and Cmi Corporation v. Astec Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.