Legal Opinion
Browne v. N.Y.S. Court System
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 6, 1984No. CV 84-2360PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
PLATT, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Thomas L. Browne, Jr., who appears pro se, commenced this action by filing a “complaint” against the above named defendants. It is unclear what conduct he alleges wronged him and what relief he seeks. The defendants move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) on the following grounds: (1) the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; (2) this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction; (3) this Court lacks in personam jurisdiction; and (4) the plaintiff fails to join a necessary party.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Alabama v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mathews v. KilroeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gabe Kaimowitz v. The Florida Bar, Its Agents, Employees and AssigneesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Feliciano v. Tribunal Supremo De Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999
- Boltes v. EntexDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
- Kaimowitz v. Florida BarDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1992