Legal Opinion
Casillas v. Schubauer
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 26, 2006No. 23773PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Ramona Casillas (Casillas) and Delora Stickelman (Stickelman) were injured when Casillas’ vehicle collided with an eighteen-hundred pound Black Angus bull (the black bull) owned by Ted Schu-bauer (Schubauer). Casillas and Stickel-man brought a negligence action against Schubauer. After discovery, Schubauer filed a motion for summary judgment. The circuit court granted the motion. Ca-sillas and Stickelman appeal. We reverse and remand for trial.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Casillas and Stickelman reside in North Platte, Nebraska. On May 30, 2002, they drove to Mission, South Dakota, to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- State, Department of Revenue v. ThiewesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Lamp v. First National Bank of GarretsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Bordeaux v. Shannon County SchoolsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Behrens v. WedmoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- First American Bank & Trust, N.A. v. Farmers State Bank of CantonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- DeHaven v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Andrushchenko v. SilchukSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Nicolay v. StukelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Millea v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.