Legal Opinion
State v. Hill
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 5, 2001No. 2000-0591PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 191.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. HILL, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Hill,
2001-Ohio-141.] Criminal law—Use of anonymous juries—Appellate review—When court of appeals engages in a plain-error analysis, it must conduct a complete review of all assignments of error in order to determine whether a manifest miscarriage of justice has occurred that clearly affected the outcome of the trial. (No. 00-591—Submitted January 30, 2001—Decided July 5, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Fairfield County, No. 98CA67.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. Davis, 06ca21 (7-26-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. Carver, 21328 (9-12-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Hairston, 07ap-160 (11-6-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.