Legal Opinion

McGee v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 28, 1985No. C14-83-105-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JUNELL, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of delivery of less than 200 grams of a controlled substance, Pentazocine, under Tex.Rev.Civ. StatAnn. art. 4476-15 §§ 4.02(d)(4)(U), 4.032(b) (Vernon Supp.1985). His sentence was enhanced by one prior felony conviction, and he was sentenced to twenty years’ confinement and fined $5000.00. We affirm the conviction.

A recitation of facts is unnecessary.

In grounds of error one and two, appellant argues that his conviction should be reversed because the state did not allege and the court did not charge that the quantity of Pentazocine he delivered…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ex Parte DuffyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Ingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Ramos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Simon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  2. Hubbard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  3. Cade v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  4. Dockins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Arthur Lafayette, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API