Legal Opinion

Dockins v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 6, 1993No. 6-92-144-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

A jury convicted Charles Dockins, Jr. of forgery and assessed his punishment at ninety-nine years’ imprisonment.

On appeal, Dockins contends that a reversal is required because, at the guilt-innocence stage of the trial, the prosecutor read to the jury the paragraphs of the indictment alleging prior convictions; the court allowed a police officer to testify about an oral statement Dockins gave; the court improperly allowed into evidence a typed, but unsigned copy of the statement; and the court allowed the testimony of a witness not revealed by the State’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Stoker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Bridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Hightower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Depena v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  2. Antonio Lamont Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  3. Antonio Lamont Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  4. Darcy Julio De Pena v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  5. Ernesto Reyes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API