Dockins v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.
A jury convicted Charles Dockins, Jr. of forgery and assessed his punishment at ninety-nine years’ imprisonment.
On appeal, Dockins contends that a reversal is required because, at the guilt-innocence stage of the trial, the prosecutor read to the jury the paragraphs of the indictment alleging prior convictions; the court allowed a police officer to testify about an oral statement Dockins gave; the court improperly allowed into evidence a typed, but unsigned copy of the statement; and the court allowed the testimony of a witness not revealed by the State’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Stoker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Bridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Hightower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Depena v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
- Antonio Lamont Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- Antonio Lamont Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- Darcy Julio De Pena v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
- Ernesto Reyes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.