Legal Opinion
Duran v. Xerox Corp.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 2, 1986No. 9240PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
The Subsequent Injury Fund (Fund) appeals from judgments in favor of the employer and the worker, contending (1) that the worker’s complaint against the Fund is barred because the certificate of preexisting physical impairment was executed as well as filed after the subsequent injury on which his complaint is based; (2) that, in any event, both the worker’s and the employer’s complaints against the Fund were time-barred; and (3) that neither the worker nor the employer may proceed against the Fund because they had entered a court-approved settlement prior to trial. Other…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Reynolds v. Ruidoso Racing Association, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Vaughn v. United Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Varos v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. PendleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Wylie Corp. v. MowrerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hernandez v. Levi Strauss, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Rader v. Don J. Cummings Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- Kennecott Copper Corp. v. ChavezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- Mares v. Valencia County Sheriff's DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ulibarri v. Homestake Mining Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.