Legal Opinion

Fechheimer v. Goldnamer

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 21, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Hardin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

On June 10, 1902, B. F. Goldnamer executed his note to the appellants for three thousand dollars. The note was executed at Cynthiana, Ky., was due in one day after date, and was payable at the office of the appellants in Cincinnati, O. It was endorsed on the back thereof by S. Goldnamer & Sons, who were a partnership composed of Samuel and Louis Goldnamer.

In April, 1914, the appellant brought suit on the note against the principal, B. F. Goldnamer, and the endorsers, Louis and Samuel Goldnamer, to recover the balance due on the note. The endorsers…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stevens v. GreggCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
  2. German National Bank v. ZimmerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. BurbankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  2. Oliver v. Crewdson's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Daniel v. Wilhoit, State Banking Com'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  4. Goodin v. PageCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API