Legal Opinion

Warden v. Bittleson Law & Collection Agency

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1919No. Civ. No. 2885PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

Plaintiff sued to quiet title to a parcel of land in the city of Los Angeles, claimed by her by reason of an assessment sale under the Street Improvement Act of 1909. (Stats.- 1909, p. 1042.) Defendants recovered judgment; plaintiff appeals. The appeal presents for our .consideration the sufficiency of certain notices of redemption.

Defendants Robert H. Punter and Rebecca Punter -were owners of the land as tenants in common. On March 19, 1914, they mortgaged the property to defendant Krug. Pursuant to a decree foreclosing the mortgage, Krug purchased the property at sheriff’s sale on July 20,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. White v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. California & Nevada Railroad v. MecartneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. HerzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Warden v. GriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Krug v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Colkins v. DoolittleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. California Public Improvement Securities, Inc. v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API