Warden v. Bittleson Law & Collection Agency
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
Plaintiff sued to quiet title to a parcel of land in the city of Los Angeles, claimed by her by reason of an assessment sale under the Street Improvement Act of 1909. (Stats.- 1909, p. 1042.) Defendants recovered judgment; plaintiff appeals. The appeal presents for our .consideration the sufficiency of certain notices of redemption.
Defendants Robert H. Punter and Rebecca Punter -were owners of the land as tenants in common. On March 19, 1914, they mortgaged the property to defendant Krug. Pursuant to a decree foreclosing the mortgage, Krug purchased the property at sheriff’s sale on July 20,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- White v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- California & Nevada Railroad v. MecartneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. HerzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Warden v. GriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Krug v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Colkins v. DoolittleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- California Public Improvement Securities, Inc. v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.