Legal Opinion
Riverside County Flood Control v. Joseph W. Wolfskill Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 21, 1957No. Civ. 5507PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COUGHLIN, J. pro tem. *
This is an action in eminent domain seeking the condemnation of real property in the county of Riverside for a flood control channel. Besides appellant, which was a corporation with offices in the county of Los Angeles, the named defendants are John M. Coudures, Jr., and the county of Riverside. In due course, appellant moved for a change of venue upon the ground that “a fair and impartial trial cannot he had in the county of Riverside and . . . the county of Riverside is a party to said action.” The motion was made upon an affidavit; opposed by a further affidavit;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Sacramento Drainage Dist.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Gordon v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Argyle Dredging Co. v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- People v. Spring Valley Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Blumer v. Kirkman CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reubin v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Pacific States Enterprises, Inc. v. City of CoachellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Vanoni v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Garrett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- San Diegans for Open Government v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.