Legal Opinion

People v. Gordon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Case made after judgment from Wayne. Action upon forfeited recognizances. Defendants had judgment below.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

Suit was commenced upon a forfeited recognizance.

Upon the trial objections were made that there was a variance between the allegations in the declaration and the recognizance offered in evidence, and that the latter was fatally uncertain and defective.

In the declaration Gordon was charged with having, at a time and place mentioned, “feloniously and burglariously broken and entered” with intent, etc., while the language of the recognizance was- that he “did break and enter.” These objections were not well taken. The recitals in substance are alike, and the charge as set forth .in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hickey v. HinsdaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BenmoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. People v. HanawMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API