Legal Opinion
Starling v. United States
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided May 12, 2009No. C.A. No.: 8:08-888-PMD-BHHPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, District Judge.
Plaintiff John B. Starling (“Plaintiff’), an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution (“FCI”) in Jesup, Georgia, filed this pro se action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), with jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680. Plaintiff also filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction to Pursue Local Treatment pursuant to F.R.C.P. 65(a). The record contains the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bennett v. Well CareDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022
- Redding v. MeadeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
- Sims v. Maryland Department of Safety and Correctional ServicesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020