Legal Opinion

Healy. v. Eastlake

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shore

The question presented by this record is as to what estate appellee took under the will of her mother. If she took the fee simple, or can convey the fee simple, the decree for specific performance was properly entered, otherwise not.

It is elementary that the intention of the testator, as expressed in his will, shall govern in its construction. In giving effect to the intention, every provision, whenever doubt or uncertainty supervenes, is, if possible, to be given significance and force.

It is insisted by counsel for appellee that the daughter, Alice, took an estate in fee simple, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith T. v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Ide v. IdeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  3. Hamlin v. United States Express Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Friedman v. SteinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Murfitt v. JessopIllinois Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Orr v. YatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Gahan v. GoldenIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Killefer v. BassettMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Defrees v. BrydonIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Merwin v. StevensonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API