Legal Opinion

Town of Middlebury v. Steinmann

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 19, 1983No. 10194PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGIeillo, J.

In this appeal from a declaratory judgment, wherein the defendants’ ownership interests in certain real property were found to be subordinate to the plaintiff’s right of way acquired through condemnation proceedings, the defendants allege error in the conclusion of the trial court that the defendants possessed actual or constructive knowledge of the pendency of the condemnation action.

The trial court could have reasonably found the following facts as supported by the record: During the spring of 1969, the plaintiff town of Middlebury, through counsel, commenced a series of negotiations with…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  2. Town Bank & Trust Co. v. BensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Hardisty v. HardistySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Hennessey v. HennesseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  5. Morris v. CostaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Halpern v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Noethe v. NoetheConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. Bombero v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  4. Handy v. Minwax Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  5. Lazoff v. PadgettConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API