Legal Opinion

Matthaei v. Clark

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1919No. 3034PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Original application by Matthaei and others to the Supreme Court for writ of mandamus against Clark, as District Judge, and Charles 0. Austin, as Commissioner of Insurance and Banking. H. M. Richey answered as successor in office to Judge Clark.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hawkins

This is an original action in this court for writs of mandamus to the judge of a District Court and the Commissioner of Insurance and Banking, respectively, whereby nine relators, as stockholders of Texas Fidelity and Bonding Company, a domestic corporation, seek to have this court control official actions of said officers in relation to certain litigation and certain legal and business affairs of said corporation, as hereinafter more specifically indicated. Especially do relators pray that the district judge be required to vacate and set aside and that the Commissioner be required to ignore…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Morrow v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Iley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Pope v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State Ex Rel. Wade v. MaysCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Mauzy v. Legislative Redistricting BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API