Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Protect Fayetteville v. City of Fayetteville

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 31, 2019No. CV-17-873Published

1ConcurrenceRobin F. Wynne, Justice

I agree with the majority that our decision in Protect Fayetteville v. City of Fayetteville , 2019 Ark. 30, 565 S.W.3d 477, renders this interlocutory appeal moot. The issue, in my opinion, with applying the substantial-public-interest mootness exception in this case is that mere recognition of the privileges will not prevent any future litigation. See Terry v. White , 374 Ark. 387, 288 S.W.3d 199 (2008) (declining to apply the substantial-public-interest exception where a decision would in no way prevent future litigation). The majority opinion gives no direction to the bench or bar that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Terry v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Protect Fayetteville v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API