Legal Opinion
Whitaker v. Fresno Telsat, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 14, 1999No. 99 Civ. 6059(SAS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Defendant American Telecasting, Inc. (“ATI”) moves, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), to dismiss plaintiffs Amended Complaint which seeks payment of legal fees. Because this Court lacks personal jurisdiction over ATI, the motion is granted.
I. FACTS
The plaintiff in this action, Ridley M. Whitaker, is an attorney licensed to practice in the State of New York. The Amended Complaint alleges that plaintiff was injured as a result of a conspiracy among the defendants, 1 including ATI, to deprive plaintiff of fees allegedly due under a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Robertson-Ceco Corp., United Dominion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Bruce Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Whitaker v. American Telecasting, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- International Healthcare Exchange, Inc. v. Global Healthcare Exchange, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- In Re Sumitomo Copper LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Skrodzki v. MarcelloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Mirman v. FeinerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.