Legal Opinion · Dissent

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Finn

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 1976No. Appeal, No. 200 C.D. 1975Published

1Dissent

*518Dissenting Opinion by

Judge Mencee

I respectfully dissent.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. Mrs. Finn was laid off, due to • lack of work, by TRW Incorporated/where’she had been employed for sixteen years. On June 3, 1974, she and her husband purchased a hotel iii Sunbury, Pennsylvania, and acquired a liquor license for the hotel bar. The property and lieénse are held jointly by Mr. and Mrs. Finn. The referee found that Mrs. Finn performs no work in connection with the hotel nor does she receive income directly from its operations. Plowever, she and her husband live on the income…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wedner Unemployment Compensation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Edelman v. UNEMPL. COMP. BD. of REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. DePriest Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Leary v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Martin Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API