Legal Opinion

Whitefish Credit Union v. Prindiville

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 2015No. DA 15-0155PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Whitefish Credit Union (WCU) appeals from the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, challenging the District Court’s determination that a hearing was required to determine the fair market value of a foreclosed property, as well as the District Court’s valuation of the property and denial of a deficiency judgment.

¶2 WCU raises several issues that we restate as follows:

1. Did the District Court err by ruling that a hearing was necessary as a matter of law to determine the fair market value of the foreclosed property on a request for a deficiency judgment?

2. Did the District…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In re A.N.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. HartMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. DanielsMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hawkins v. HarneyMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Trustees of Washington — Idaho — Montana Carpenters — Employers Retirement Trust Fund v. Galleria PartnershipMontana Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MillsMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Whitefish Credit Union v. PrindivilMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. v. Smith-Cote (In re Cote)Montana Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API