Legal Opinion

B & B Corp. v. S & T Industries, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 7, 1988No. 86 Civ. 1657 (BN)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

NEWMAN, Senior Judge of the United States Court of International Trade,

sitting by designation:

INTRODUCTION

In this diversity action, plaintiff B & B Corporation, a ladies garment contractor located in Florida, sues to recover $49,-011.83 representing the unpaid balance claimed to be due for its services in producing certain wearing apparel for defendant S & T Industries, Inc., a ladies garment manufacturer located in New York. 1 Additionally, plaintiff seeks an award of its attorney’s fees pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

Paddack v. Dave Christensen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
Kramer, Levin, Nessen, Kamin & Frankel v. AronoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
Gilmour v. Strescon Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
Hudson v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
Manes Organization, Inc. v. Standard Dyeing & Finishing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Co. v. Fairfield Communities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
Ibj Schroder Bank & Trust Company v. Fairfield Communities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999