Legal Opinion

McNeal v. Truesdell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 20, 1933No. 20939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.

The writer hereof is of the opinion- that this appeal is wholly without merit.

The record discloses about the following state of facts: Plaintiff in error, P. A. McNeal, plaintiff in the trial court, sued the defendants in error, E. D. Truesdell and wife, Lula M. Truesdell, defendants in error, seeking to foreclose a mortgage on the latter’s home. For the sake of convenience the parties herein will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants, as they appeared in the court below. Plaintiff based his cause of action solely on the ground that his mortgage provided that defendant should “keep the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Surety Co. v. Tyler & Simpson Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Van Arsdale-Osborne Brokerage Co v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Van Arsdale-Osborne Brokerage Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Sutton v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. MattesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Lawton v. LincolnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API