Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Carter

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 31, 1909No. 1528PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Trover, from city court of Dublin. — Judge Burch. October 13, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

Carter brought an action of trover against Thompson to recover a promissory note for $390, signed by the plaintiff and made payable to the defendant. The plaintiff elected to take a money verdict, and the jury found a verdict in his favor for an amount slightly smaller than the face of the note with interest. Assuming the evidence in behalf of the plaintiff to be true, he made out the following state of facts: Thompson was the owner of a certain horse, which was lame, and, pending negotiations for the purchase of the horse by Carter, the parties agreed upon a price which was satisfactory to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Holmes v. Langston & WoodsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Heitmann v. Commercial BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Liptrot v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
  5. Rushin v. TharpeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Georgia Casualty Co. v. McRitchieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  2. Hicks v. MoyerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Great Southern Accident & Fidelity Co. v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. Hogg v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  5. Whelchel v. RoarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API