Crosby v. Patch
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Fourth District. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.
Cope, J. concurring.
This is an action to recover the sum of five hundred and seventy-five dollars paid, under protest, by the plaintiffs to the defendant, who was at the time Tax Collector of the city and county of San Francisco, in order to release from seizure and threatened sale certain property belonging to them, seized by him for taxes of the fiscal year ending in 1858, levied on consigned goods in their hands. The case was tried without a jury and the Court found that the plaintiffs were at the time importing merchants ; that the goods upon which the tax was levied were in their…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Pyne v. LaGraveNevada Supreme Court · 1895
- Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Nordyke v. PastrellNevada Supreme Court · 1932
- Swensen v. McDanielDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1953
- Canode v. SewellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.