Legal Opinion
Swensen v. McDaniel
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided November 23, 1953No. 976PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLEY, District Judge.
The complaint sets forth three causes of action all having to do with the same accident or transaction. The accident with which we are here concerned is the same as that which is made the basis of Case No. 974, Williams v. McDaniel, 119 F.Supp. 247, and Case No. 975, Roy L. Wilson and Lillian Norcutt, as the sole heirs at law of Oren Wilson, deceased, v. Helen V. McDaniel.
Motion to Dismiss.
The first paragraph of defendant’s motion to dismiss is upon the ground that the complaint does not state a claim upon which relief can be granted. In support of this ground, defendant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Robertson v. CeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Pardini v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Pyne v. LaGraveNevada Supreme Court · 1895
- Parker v. TrefryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Bonfils v. HayesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harris v. BD. OF EDUC. OF COLUMBUS, OHIODistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
- Bruttomesso v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentNevada Supreme Court · 1979
- Broderson v. BoehmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Williams v. McDanielDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1953
- Health and Happiness (H&H) US LLC v. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. and Nutramax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026