Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Remo v. Golding

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1902No. 3,907PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Shelby Circuit Court; Douglas Morris, Judge. Action by State on the relation of Frank B. Remo against James E. Golding and others for-damages on a bond given for sale of intoxicating liquors. From a judgment for defendants on demurrer to complaint, relator appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

Appellees Golding and Bogeman were licensed retailers of liquors, and were engaged in the saloon business under a license issued to them jointly, and exe^cuted jointly -the bond required by statute for retail liquor dealers, with appellees Relime and Deprez as sureties. Appellant brought this action against all the appellees upon that bond, to recover damages for alleged injuries received in the place of business of Golding and Bogeman, by being assaulted therein, and for money of which he charges he was robbed while therein. All the appellees demurred separately to the' complaint, which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Collins v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1853
  2. Gray v. State ex rel. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Norton v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1867
  4. Spaulding v. NathanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brindle v. AnglinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Lawlor v. State ex rel. ShattoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. State Ex Rel. Stone v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Romy v. State, ex rel. BrannanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API