Legal Opinion

Gray v. State ex rel. Mills

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 8019PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Best, C.

The facts out of which this controversy arises are briefly these: At the January term, 1870, of the common pleas court of Hamilton county, Indiana, the appellant Elisha Mills, as guardian of Frank A. Mills, the relator, and Clara M. Mills, his sister, filed his application to sell their real estate, caused it to be appraised, and, upon the order of the court, executed his bond, with his co-appellants as his sureties, and upon its approval obtained an order to sell such real estate, which he subsequently did for the sum of $2,340. After the relator attained full age, he brought this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griffith v. FrazierSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
  2. Pryor v. DowneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Deford v. MercerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  4. Collins v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1853
  5. Coon v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  2. Sokoloff v. Fidelity Cas. Co. of N. Y.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. State ex rel. Haines v. ParrishIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Brindle v. AnglinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. State ex rel. Metsker v. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API