Legal Opinion

Ætna Insurance v. Peavy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 11, 1911No. 3116PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action on insurance policy; from city court of Ocilla — Juflg-o Oxford. December 12, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

1. While it is true, as was. held in Stanley v. Stanley, 123 Qa. 122, that a suit instituted by one as next friend of a person duly adjudged insane is .subject to dismissal.-upon timely special demurrer (unless amended), if the petition fails to disclose that the insane peíson has no guardian, and alleges no other reason why it is necessary or proper for him to sue by next friend rather than by a duly appointed guardian, nevertheless, where a suit is instituted in the name of a person who, pending the trial of the suit, is found to be insane, and it appears from the record that the court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kelly & Brother v. Kauffman Milling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Arnold v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. Citizens BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. King v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Smith v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. Gray v. General Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API