Legal Opinion

King v. Baker

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 3, 1964No. 40419PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pannell, Judge.

1. Where a landlord is sued by a tenant seeking damages for an alleged unlawful eviction occurring while the tenant was absent on a trip, in which suit punitive damages are sought, it is proper, on cross examination of the defendant landlord, to elicit information as to his knowledge of the law relating to the legal and proper method of evicting a tenant. Such evidence bears directly on the question at issue.

2. The following charge is patently argumentative and inflammatory and the giving of same was reversible error: “Where a landlord, without the tenant’s consent and before…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kelly & Brother v. Kauffman Milling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Furney v. TowerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Strahley v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. Arnold v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. BranchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Omni International, Ltd. v. Mimi's of Atlanta, Inc. (In Re Mimi's of Atlanta, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1980
  2. City of Atlanta v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. City of Atlanta v. Victor BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. State Highway Department v. RutlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  5. State Highway Department v. RutlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API