Legal Opinion
Francoline v. Klatt
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 10, 1991No. 9659PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The named defendant1 appeals from the judgment rendered against her on her counterclaim alleging a violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes §§ 42-110a through 42-110q.2 The defendant filed the counterclaim in response to the plaintiff’s action for specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of certain of *205the defendant’s real property. The defendant claims that the trial court applied an incorrect legal standard and that it failed to conclude from the facts found that a violation of CUTPA had been established as a matter of law. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- A-G Foods, Inc. v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Conaway v. PrestiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- McLaughlin Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Bowman v. 1477 Central Avenue Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GuckianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Francoline v. KlattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Housing Authority v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026
- Leaksealers v. Connecticut National Bank, No. Cv 92 0517952 (Jun. 20, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995