Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 17, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge KELLEY.

Barry Griffith (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which reversed in part, modified in part, and affirmed in part, the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge. We affirm.

Claimant suffered a work-related injury on September 16, 1996, while employed by Ford New Holland (Employer). A notice of compensation payable (NCP) was issued on September 27, 1996, which described the injury as “right femoral hernia.” Claimant received total disability benefits at the compensation rate of $499.73 per week based on an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Lehigh County Vo-Tech School v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Mrs. Smith's Frozen Foods Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Groch v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Lukens, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reavis v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Wheeler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Fraisar v. GillisCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Bologna v. Pennsylvania Department of Labor & IndustryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. C. Brooks-McCollum v. WCAB (The Boeing Company)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API